Please complete the below form to submit comments. The Deadline for comments is Friday 26th July 2019. View Consultation Document here BSF Consultation Scope of Regulatory System Do you agree that the regulatory scope should apply to buildings 18m and over? Yes No The government is proposing a risk based regulatory system to ensure that high risk buildings are safe. Do you agree with this approach? Yes No There is a proposal to also extend the regulatory scope to other types of buildings such as prisons, hospitals, educational establishments and specialised housing (sheltered/supported/extra care). Do you agree the scope should include these types of buildings? Yes No Government are proposing a suitable transition period. What transition period do you think is suitable to extend to existing/other buildings? Don't agree 1-2 Years 3-5 Years 5 Years + Government are looking at existing regulation that overlaps e.g. Health and Safety Rating System and the Fire Safety Order. What comments do you have on what should be done to enusure "whole building" risks are managed where there is more than one responsible person or leaseholders? Do you have any other comments on the proposals regarding the scope of the regulatory system? A new dutyholder regime for buildings 18m or more Do you agree with the principal of three gateway points to control safety throughout the design and construction phase and prior to handover? Yes No Do you agree with the transitional arrangements for existing projects for the gateway points e.g. you only hit the next gateway point dependent on the stage of delivery? Yes No Do you agree with the introduction of the accountable person? Yes No Do you agree with the responsibilities set out for the accountable person e.g. duty to promote safety, to appoint a building safety manager, to register all relevant buildings and to be a senior named individual? Yes No Do you agree the building safety manager role should be a mandatory/statutory role? Yes No Please give any further comments here on the building safety manager Do you agree with the competency proposals? Yes No What do you think about how competency can be delivered in the future? Golden Thread of Information Do you think Building Information Modelling (BIM) Standards should be mandated? Yes No What impact do you think golden thread of information will have on your organisation? e.g. the safety case regime, key dataset and mandatory occurence reporting Any other comments on golden thread, safety cases or mandatory occurrence reporting? Residents Voice Do you agree that the proposed duty to co-operate placed on residents will enable safety to be delivered? Yes No Do you agree that proportionate access should be provided where there is a life safety risk to others? Yes No Any comments on the residents duty to co-operate or in relation to access? Do you agree that relevant fire safety information should be freely available to residents? Yes No Any comments on information provided to residents? Any other comments on Residents Voice? A new Regulator Do you agree that a new building safety regulator should be formed? Yes No Do you agree that construction products should also been regulated? Yes No Any comments on the new regulator(s) or enforcement sections of the consultation? Other Costs have been outlined in broad terms in Annex A, In practical terms do you have any comments on costs to fund the new system, or any potential impacts on your organisation? About You (optional) Your Name Email Enter your email address if you would like a copy of your submission Organisation Name If you are a NSHFSG Member, which regional group are you a member of? London and South East Midlands Wales South West East Anglia North West North East Yorkshire and Humberside reCAPTCHA Submit If you are human, leave this field blank.